[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tennis wall

[Yves]

I think it's OK to omit the obvious, such a pitch can (and will) be mapped as node, way, area or multipolygon relations whatever the wiki says. If we are to be over-accurate and extremely verbose, there is always a risk the definition excludes a fair use that is not obvious at the moment.
Yves 


Le 14 juillet 2021 16:08:04 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Am Mi., 14. Juli 2021 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Michele Galimberti <
>galimbertimichele at gmail.com>:
>
>> This is my first proposal in Openstreetmap, so I'm sorry if I didn't use
>> some of the best practices about mapping with nodes. I can only say that I
>> tried to get all the info I needed before I created it, and I certainly
>> didn't want to trigger anyone.
>>
>
>
>in substance, you can always use a node in OSM to represent an area, and
>you should typically prefer an area /closed way, in particular if you are
>interested in conveying information about size, shape, orientation and
>possibly things inside the thing you are mapping (topology). Still, it is
>perfectly ok to represent a playground or a football with (or anything
>else) with just a node, e.g. because you are too lazy to draw an area, just
>be aware that it is preliminary and someone else will likely convert it to
>an area, sooner or later.
>
>Nodes are usually not converted to areas if they represent very small
>things, e.g. a post_box will hardly be mapped as an area, nor will a pole
>be mapped as a circle. Everything up to a telephone booth is likely to stay
>as a node, unless we will become very detailed ;-)
>
>
>Cheers,
>Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210714/14e83666/attachment.htm>