[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

The discussion about the key was already settled. The majority preferred natural=* over landcover=* and landuse=* and I prefer natural to. natural=shrubs was also settled already that is it not an option. You will get the same discussion as with shrubbery: why not use natural=scrub? And it is not that I refuse to accept alternatives. I try to find consensus among the majority of mappers.
________________________________
Van: Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>
Verzonden: donderdag 15 juli 2021 20:48
Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2

On Thursday, 15 July 2021, Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com<mailto:vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com>> wrote:
> It can be me but I don't quite understand the problem you want to adress. How does this proposal make less sematic sense?

Scrub is wild.  Uncultivated.  Adding cultivated to an uncultivated thing is a contradiction in terms.

Landcover=shrubs describes it perfectly.  Given the way we already abuse natural to include cultivated plants, then natural=shrubs would also work.  But you refuse to accept either of those and instead keep coming up with alternatives that others dislike.  Around and around we go.

--
Paul

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210715/f5a66b8f/attachment.htm>