[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Rejected - Giant furniture

[PanierAvide]

Hello,

Totally agreeing with this, additionally I would say that there doesn't 
seem to be any issue in mapping giant furniture, the vote only shows 
that a different tag would be more consensual.

If you have enough energy and motivation to propose changes and come 
back with a different tagging solution, this would be best solution for 
everyone : a properly documented tag that fits community needs. But as 
these proposal process can be really time/energy consuming, there is no 
need to hurry or even to go for it. Take care of yourself before taking 
care of what wiki community wants ;-)

Best regards,

Adrien P.

Le 18/06/2021 à 12:19, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 07:03 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli 
> <francians at gmail.com <mailto:francians at gmail.com>>:
>
>     the proposal was rejected with 9 votes for and 19 votes against.
>
>
>
> sorry for this
>
>
>     I won't redraft it and will not map (and probably delete from OSM)
>     such features since no valid tagging exists...
>
>
>
> you should not delete any tags from OSM just because a proposal for 
> their definition has been rejected, particularly if there aren't any 
> (supposedly) synonymous tags established.
> By definition, any use of undocumented tags is valid (any tags you like).
>
> There seems to be a misconception, what got rejected was your prosal 
> for a definition, not the tag. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210618/119a60b7/attachment.htm>