[Tagging] Help me tag, pls!

[Tamas Rell]

Checked a few Chinatown gates, which I think is similar and I found many
varieties: building=roof, historic=city_gate, tourism=attraction,
tourism=artwork, historic=monument etc.

It's definitely not historical, not attraction and not art. I'd choose
city_gate, but it exists only with the historic= key, so it's also out.
Wikipedia defines gantry as "an overhead bridge-like structure supporting
equipment such as a crane, signals, or cameras.", that's not the case
either, no equipment involved.

I guess it's really a plain building=roof.

Tamas

Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. márc.
8., H, 22:00):

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 8 Mar 2021, at 21:37, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently in Argentina they map these as "artwork":
>
>
> I can imagine similar structures in similar situations being viable
> candidates for artwork, in this specific case I completely reject the idea.
>
> > I suggested "Man_made=entrance_arch"
>
>
> in this case, „arch“ does not apply.
>
>
> >
> > Another mapper says they used "man_made=gantry"
>
>
> not a native speaker, but aren’t gantries more technical, and located on
> roads rather than pedestrian ways?
>
>
> >
> > It was also mentioned that one should add "maxheight=" to the way which
> goes under it.
>
>
> if there’s no legal restriction, maxheight:physical might be better suited.
>
> I believe building=roof is an appropriate representation of this
> particular instance.
>
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210308/db147490/attachment-0001.htm>