[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway link
Bert -Araali- Van Opstal
bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 13:17:07 UTC 2021
You are trying to propose a mapping practise that is no real world
feature - and not consistent with "link" concept for other highway=*
We don't map for the router. Actually I don't see any added value in
this tag how this would improve or simplify a router program.
Why a new tag for something we already have and is solved simple and
broadly used with existing tags ?
I started your discussion page, find more details and examples for my
arguments on your discussion page :).
On 10/03/2021 11:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 10 Mar 2021, at 05:40, Seth Deegan <jayandseth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ever wondered what to map when a sidewalk ends without a crossing or
>> how to connect access ailes with parking ailes?
>> **=link *does it!
>> Highway link proposal
> there’s also modest use of highway=virtual
> but footway=link beats it by factor 10. Did you check how it is used?
> I believe we can already map the situation you are describing where a
> sidewalk ends:
> split at the kerb, connect to the street highway (this is always done,
> the last part of a footway connecting to a street is always virtual).
> Add footway=sidewalk to the sidewalk and footway=crossing to the part
> on the road. Tag the crossing node with highway=crossing and
> Cheers Martin
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging