[Tagging] Tagging piste:difficulty for track piste:type=nordic; skitour

[Yves]

One solution could be piste:grooming:skitour=classic piste:difficulty:skitour=easy etc. 

The prefix piste is important because of piste:grooming:hike

What do others think? 
Regards, 
Yves 



Le 5 mai 2021 21:19:16 GMT+02:00, "Jaromír Mikeš" <mira.mikes at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Hello,
>sorry for the late answer.
>Alternative 1) and also 2) is very time consuming and not very easy and
>intuitive solutions
>I saw quite a lot of piste:grooming=skate;classic or
>piste:grooming=skate+classic used in Czech mountains and also some cases of
>piste:type=skitour;nordic or piste:type=downhill;nordic
>piste:type=nordic;sled etc.
>So I wouldn't say it is a rare cases ... and maybe they would be even more
>usual if there would be a defined way to tag them.
>I've also contacted OsmAnd support ( my favorite map app) with this
>question and you were right two values separated with semicolon are not
>supported.
>I've opened a bug in their tracker with this topic because I believe there
>are such cases in real situations.
>
>best regards
>mira
>
>čt 29. 4. 2021 v 12:49 odesílatel Yves via Tagging <
>tagging at openstreetmap.org> napsal:
>
>> 2) Paul's second option is not very advisable when you map difficulty and
>> grooming on each way of the route.
>>
>> Both several difficulties (or grooming) semicolon separated and adjacent
>> ways are present in the database, but they are very rare.
>> The semicolon variant is not likely to be used by data consumer, and
>> multiple ways are a pain to edit, so I'm afraid that there is no formal and
>> good solution to this yet.
>>
>> Yves - Opensnowmap
>>
>>
>> Le 29 avril 2021 09:38:20 GMT+02:00, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 06:44, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would something like this make sense?
>>>> piste:type=nordic;skitour
>>>> piste:difficulty=intermediate;easy
>>>> Different difficulty in same order as piste types?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It makes sense to the extent that something similar was done for
>>> electricity pylons, but data consumers may not bother to implement
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Two alternatives:
>>>
>>> 1) Duplicate the way, make one piste:type=nordic + piste:difficulty=
>>> intermediate; make the other piste:type=skitour; piste:difficulty=easy.
>>>
>>> 2) Use route=piste to create two routes that both incorporate the same
>>> way, one route for nordic and the other for skitour.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210505/b34c612c/attachment-0001.htm>