[Tagging] pressurized=* on pipelines

[François Lacombe]

Hi Alan, Kyle,

> If the tag pressure=yes is acceptable we should definitely document this.

I completely second that, it's possible to start a proposal (or have an
extensive discussion about) on pressure=* tag.
My point is only to not introduce a supplementary tag.

Obviously I would like to write "if pressure > *1* then
waterway=pressurised is expected." earlier today.
It's bars.

Le mer. 15 sept. 2021 à 19:05, Alan Mackie <aamackie at gmail.com> a écrit :

> How verifiable is this tag in practice?
>

Regarding pressurised waterways, it's often verifiable the intake gets no
air, so the fluid runs pipe flow inside.

Other pipelines often are pressurised when it comes to carry some fluid,
unless it's pure gravity with special design for that.


> I think this runs the risk of tagging speculation except in rare cases.
> Should this be limited to situations with warning signs about "contents
> under pressure" etc.?
>

This is a topic for hazard:*=*, aren't you?

All the best

François
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210916/b7dceeb1/attachment-0001.htm>