[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - creameries

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am So., 19. Sept. 2021 um 23:08 Uhr schrieb Anne-Karoline Distel <
annekadistel at web.de>:

> Hi all,
>
> I hope this proposal will cover all ground for disused creameries, but
> also leave room for ones that are still in use:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/creamery
> I'm hoping to get a few more pictures, but that's really a project in
> itself.



You are proposing several tags to describe the nature:

building=industrial
disused:man_made=works
disused:product=dairy
historic=creamery


I would go with historic=creamery (together with building=* or on the
grounds) and not add disused:man_made=works and disused:product=dairy,
these seem redundant and not able to tell that it is about a historic
creamery.

building=industrial IMHO is too generic. It is like building=residential,
people are using it, but more specific values like house, villa,
apartments, duplex, detached etc. are preferable.
For example we could distinguish production and storage buildings, we might
also be able to identify more specific subtypes for production places, e.g.
foundry, assembly hall, etc.

For a creamery, building=creamery seems suitable, especially if these are
of a distinguishable building type of course.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210920/9bcc9f6e/attachment.htm>