[Tagging] oneway bike lanes and tracks

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 28 Apr 2022, at 13:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 
> defaults to oneway=yes and 2 to no?
> I would not assume that at all.
> 
> Also, is it lane count of associated road?
> 
> I see no reason why
> 
> oneway=yes lanes=3 cycleway=track
> 
> would be two way separate cycleway and
> 
> oneway=yes lanes=1 cycleway=track
> or
> oneway=no lanes=1 cycleway=track
> 
> would be one way separate cycleway



indeed, this is not what I had in mind, 
this was about 
cycleway:right=track
cycleway:right:lanes=2

implying two way traffic on the cycleway 

and cycleway:right:lanes=1

implying oneway traffic on the cycleway.

Having one cycleway with no oneway (2 lanes) is a typical configuration around here, but usually mapped with its own way.


> (though in both cases I would map separate highway=cycleway line instead)


+1, IMHO in all occurrences of cycleway=track this is better, cycleway=track was a bad idea from the beginning, every exception we introduce makes it harder for most of us, just to accommodate some special use case. Basic rule is one way per carriageway, cycleway=track is the exception.

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220428/b9e4b808/attachment-0001.htm>