[Tagging] changeset tag for automated/mecanical edit

[Mateusz Konieczny]

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
already has following about changesets:

You must also add the tag mechanical=yes (or bot=yes)

Not sure why changing that would be beneficial or useful
and you have not explained any reasons for doing this.

Aug 23, 2022, 12:17 by marc_marc at mailo.com:

> Hello,
>
> a work had been done a few years ago to make
> an inventory of all changeset tags in use [1]
>
> for mecanical/autoamted edit, There are at least two that deserve
> a better consensus:
>
> 1) a tag that describe that's is a mecanical edit
> I have see mecanical=yes reviwed=no type=mecanical
> what's did you think ? I like the idea of type
> but not the word type itself (due to its use for relation)
>
> 2) a tag that describe the scope of the edit
> I was using scope=* and I also see is_in
> is this tag better to describe the scope ?
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220823/4a5edd52/attachment.htm>