[Tagging] compressed_air=yes / no - adding to amenity=fuel

[Jez Nicholson]

As OSM is a spatial database, my strong preference would be a spatial
relationship, i.e. map a compressed air machine as a point/polygon
sat within the boundary of a petrol station. Search within the petrol
station boundary for related objects. No relation specified. No separate
object defined as an attribute of a parent object. No separate object
indicated as being separate as an attribute of a parent object..... IMHO,
sidewalk=separate was a bit of a kludge to accommodate 2 widespread and
fundamental mapping styles and shouldn't be perpetuated lightly.

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:29 PM Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:44 AM Robin Burek <robin.burek at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> "osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au" osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au –
>> 13. Dezember 2021 14:34
>> > I think it would be a good idea to generally follow the model
>> established
>> > with sidewalks here.
>> >
>> > e.g.:
>> > compressed_air=separate
>> > bench=separate
>> > ...
>> >
>> > And apply this pattern to any type of tag where a yes/no is used to
>> indicate
>> > the presence of some associated feature.
>> >
>> > With "separate" meaning "yes, but it's also mapped as it's own object
>> > nearby".
>>
>> +1
>> Or: we start to think more with relations. Then we could connect the
>> amenities direct - so that there is also the information WICH element is
>> connected with "seperate"....
>>
>
> This would be my strong preference.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220121/4b0d87cc/attachment.htm>