[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crossing:markings

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Jul 24 08:33:53 UTC 2022




Jul 23, 2022, 12:45 by 1998alexkane at gmail.com:

> I updated the proposal saying that using crossing_ref to describe pavement markings should be depricated.
>
>
Is it really fundamentally needed?

Note that as you bundle A, B, C, D in one proposals then someone opposing
any of that will vote against.

So bundling multiple changes increases opposition.

>  The biggest effect of this is that crossing_ref=zebra should be reverted to its original definition. 
>
Maybe it is useful, but can it be done separately?

> Crossing_ref certainly needs an overhaul imo (maybe something like crossing:designation=GB:zebra or the like) but this would probably be best as a separate proposal.
>
+1

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220724/67beb5fd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list