[talk-au] ABS Import Wiki page

Franc Carter franc.carter at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 08:48:23 GMT 2009

Yep, that seems to have a few advantages over the other order


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:32 PM, BlueMM <bluemm1975-osm at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Franc Carter <franc.carter at ...> writes:
> > Hi,It looks like the vote is in favour of relations and there is the
> > beginnings of consensus around other tags.So I have updated the wiki page
> [SNIP]
> Hey, crazy idea, but should we be using something like au.gov.abs:xyz as
> the
> "namespace"?
> It matches the Java library format, and would group tags really well when
> sorted
> alphabetically.
> I wanted to suggest it before our first major import as trying to change a
> notation later on would suck big time. I could see future imports following
> a
> similar format, like au.gov.vic.land, au.com.whereis etc.
> Or maybe just use the above suggestion when there will be ambiguity like
> the ABS
> case. I can imagine being consistent would make sorted tags match up very
> nicely
> (like in Tagwatch or Potlatch if/when its tags are displayed sorted - I
> don't
> think they are yet but the TIGER guys wanted it)
> Thoughts?
> BlueMM
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20090222/5ae653d2/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-au mailing list