[talk-au] Hiking tracks: foot=yes or foot=designated?
deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 09:56:07 GMT 2010
On 23 February 2010 19:46, John Henderson <snowgum at gmx.com> wrote:
> But part of that track goes through wilderness areas, where track
> markers aren't permitted. Should we be even mapping those sections,
> thereby helping create an erosion/"localised overuse" threat?
Are they marked on official maps, or at least maps easily accessible
to those likely to use those walking tracks?
>From a life threatening/emergency worker point of view, having them
mapped could mean they potentially save a life.
More information about the Talk-au