[talk-au] Princes Highway (Relation 538443)
inas66+osm at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 03:27:34 BST 2011
On 7 September 2011 11:55, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What I'm talking about here is a "route" relation. I'm arguing that we
> > don't need a named route relation called the Princes Highway.
> But your argument consists of "I can't decide which roads should make
> up the relation, so let's delete the relation".
No, I'm not say I can't decide. I'm say that there is no basis that I can
see for anyone to make such a decision.
An actual connected route along roads on the ground in this instance either
doesn't exist or cannot be determined from any verifiable source.
OSM requires verifiability<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability>,
for reasons I consider apparent. A route relation requires that there be an
actual, connected route.
On both these points, this isn't appropriate for a route relation.
Princes Highway is part of route 1.
This isn't helpful. National Route 1 and the Princes Hwy diverge at many
points. National Route 1 follows the Southern Freeway south from Sydney for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-au