[talk-au] Redaction progress

[Sam Wilson]

On Fri, July 20, 2012 2:19 pm, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Also, FWIW, the Bing imagery is generally great - I've certainly not
> seen anything like a 100m discrepancy. Wherever I have a GPS trace,
> it's always aligned very well with the Bing imagery. IMHO (possibly in
> the minority) even mapping based on misaligned imagery isn't a major
> problem. What's worse - a town that is perfectly mapped but 100m, or
> the same town not mapped at all?

I agree.  Over here in WA we've got buckets of GPS traces, all over the
place, and they're usually pretty much spot-on with Bing.