[talk-au] Hume and Hovel Walking Track in the Bargo SF

[Warin]

On 21-Feb-17 06:10 AM, John Henderson wrote:
> On 20/02/17 20:49, Warin wrote:
>
>> I'd no be worried by 10 m ... the differences are ~100 metres in
>> places. Might be more in some places too .. have not been measuring
>> .. just concerned at the differences. It could be as simple as
>> running off a map and going a bit off the official course as 'it
>> looks better'.
>
> I mapped the area around Burrinjuck Dam during the last big drought.  So
> I've got the track going well out into where the water is now, and to
> where walkers got on and off the boat at that time.
>
> Looks odd on the hiking map with the dam showing as full, especially at
> the southern end, on the Goodradigbee River to the north of Wee Jasper.

There are many tracks that 'go into' lakes Not worried by them.

Here is an example
Way: 285828626 - a track source Bing

If you compare it to the LPI Base map zoomed in to a scale of 100m in 
JOSM you will
find that path heading north about halfway along the track.
Around -35.75557/148.16232


I thing the H&H is the path shown on LPI ... not the present OSM shown 
route.
If LPI is correct and you followed OSM .. there might be a fair bit of 
true bushwalking.

To further confuse things .. Strava shows paths/tracks used in that area 
... but not the LPI path nor the OSM H&H trail.

I am inclined to;
map the LPI data .. as the H&H where I think it is appropriate.
map the strava stuff ... as a track.
remove the present OSM H&H where it looks to be replaced by either the 
OSM or strava data.

But I am still thinking about it, I don't like removing stuff!