[talk-au] Fire Station Operators
Andrew Harvey
andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 10:02:37 UTC 2020
Okay with me though it would be good if that tag was documented at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:15, Sebastian S. <mapping at consebt.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> Similar to schools the building should be tagged
>
> building=fire_station
>
> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station
>
>
> On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this is
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element,
>> there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single fire station.
>>
>> Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this can be useful
>> information and put all the tags on that, and then just have a way inside
>> it with building=yes an none of the fire station tags.
>>
>> But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just have the
>> building without the site as interim solutions or for fire stations where
>> the extent is just the building which don't have a yard.
>>
>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales <daviewales at disroot.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Somewhat related to this.
>>>
>>> Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced building, *and* a
>>> traced site border.
>>> Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station.
>>>
>>> The building has the rest of the identifying tags.
>>>
>>> I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature tagged with
>>> amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the tags. Should this be the
>>> building, or the site border?
>>>
>>> See link below:
>>>
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> David Wales
>>>
>>> On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess <mapping at consebt.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrew,
>>>> I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch.
>>>>
>>>> branch = Narrabeen Fire Station
>>>> name = Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks like, but branch
>>> should be just "Narrabeen", without the "Fire Station" words. Then you
>>> could still have name=Narrabeen Fire Station.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag was the name.
>>>>
>>>> I've also added
>>>> building = fire_station
>>>>
>>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79179815
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-au mailing listTalk-au at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-au mailing list
>>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200105/fccdca98/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list