[OSM-talk-be] Usage of "access=designated" in Belgium
Ben Laenen
benlaenen at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 11:59:14 UTC 2008
Hi all,
I wanted to discuss this for a while now, but only now I'm starting to
write things up, so... Ever since the access=designated tag came into
existence I wondered about its use in Belgium.
For people unfamiliar with the tag, the designated tag is more or less a
translation of what vehicle types are depicted on the traffic signs of
the path. So, a blue round sign with a bicycle on it would make it
bicycle=designated.
Now, I wonder if there is any value in this tag in Belgium. It might be
in other countries, but I think the access=yes tag provides all
information possible.
Example: a cycleway which doesn't belong to a street, signed with the
blue round sign with a bicycle on it
(http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D7.gif) allows pedestrians
as well. And mopeds class A, and also mopeds class B if there's no
exception sign. So that would be bicycle=designated moped=yes foot=yes,
just because the sign only has a bicycle. Now, the rules on that path
would be exactly the same if the sign showed a blue round sign with a
bicycle and pedestrians on it
(http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D10.gif), and that would
then be bicycle=designated foot=designated moped=yes.
Now, I think this is a mess :-) There's no legal difference between the
two paths, so it doesn't make sense tagging it differently.
Similarly, if one would apply this to footpaths and cycleways belonging
to a road (which I'm not really a fan for making them separate paths,
but now this proposal is coming along
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Advanced_Cycleway),
you'd get the first example on that page with the
http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D9.gif sign, and it
mentions path.foot=designated path.bicycle=designated. The thing is
that they could sign the cycleway with
http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D7.gif and it would mean
exactly the same.
Also, if a path belonging to a road is signed with
http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D7.gif and there's no
footpath, pedestrians can walk there. It would mean exactly the same as
the http://www.wegcode.be/images/verkeerstekens/D10.gif sign there.
In short, I haven't found any reason why one would use the designated
tag in Belgium. I just can't find a situation where a different tag is
needed than just "yes". So I'm wondering if other people know of any
situations. I'd like to have some Belgian conventions written up for
this in the end so I'd like to hear other opinions.
Greetings
Ben
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list