[OSM-talk-be] UrbIS - streetnumbers

[eMerzh]

Hi Anton,

Thanks for joining the fun game of integrating Urbis  :) ..
the more player we are , the more fun it will be ;-)

So, i've quickly check you first changeset ... it seems good for me ...a
few remarks though  :
- It might be easier for you to copy past the relation instead of
recreating one (see here
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-May/004054.html )
(if you don't understand i'll try to record a small vidz to see how i do
it...)
- You may want to add the addr:postcode to the relation as well (if you
copy past it it's already there ;) )
- Personnaly .. but personnaly only, i'm not fan of source=* on the tag/way
... you end up with a whole bunch of thing you don't know how to manage ...
but it can stay there...

Don't forget to add the street to the relation...(with role=street) ==> you
can see almost any street of Jette to watch how it's done...

And for the second problem, do not hesitate to put both streets side in the
relation (as long as they have the same name, same post code, ... )

Regards



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Anton Snoeys <antonsnoeys at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm new to this and found your work, thumbs up guys :-)
> I recently tried to use the 1030.osm to add information for Schaarbeek in
> JOSM.
> I'm struggling a bit with the AssociatedStreet relations. Yesterday I
> added Rue Henri Evenepoel (Changeset: 16425586), could anybody please
> check if I added the information the right way? I woudn't want to continue
> adding wrong or incomplete information.
> Today I tried to add Place de la Patrie (Changeset 16434542) but I
> couldn't add both sides of the square to the same relation (probably
> because the square is just two one way roads?).
> Sorry to bother you guys with it,
> Cheers,
> FantAntonio
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Nicolas Pettiaux <nicolas at pettiaux.be>wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/5 Pierre Parmentier <pierrecparmentier at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We can observe that where 'UrbIS' shows sometimes multiple
>> streetnumbers on
>> > a particular building way, 'CadGIS Viewer Grand Public' is quite better
>> (and
>> > univocal).
>>
>> Thanks for giving the link to this CadGIS viewer that I did not know.
>>
>> You affirmation is strange to me. I thought that there was  Urbis was
>> the reference in Brussels and that is was used by the cadaster !
>>
>> I have just checked on
>> http://www.cirb.irisnet.be/fr/catalogue-de-services/urbis
>> and I realize that there are different Urbis products. THe one that is
>> referenced
>>
>> I suppose that UrbIS-Map is used on the link that Pierre gives, while
>> UrbIS-P&B
>> is related to the cadaster data.
>>
>> There must be some good explanation why these sets of data are
>> different, but I also wonder if it would not be interesting if they
>> where only different views of the same datas.
>>
>> Has anyone more information about these ?
>>
>> This may be a question to ask to the person who will preent Urbis
>> during the rmll
>>
>>
>> http://schedule2013.rmll.info/programme/les-donnees-ouvertes/participation-citoyenne-et/article/donnees-urbis-brussels-donnees
>>
>> on Monday July 8
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nicolas
>> --
>> Nicolas Pettiaux, dr. sc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130605/cd3922a7/attachment.htm>