[OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

[mgwebmail at fastmail.fm]

Oh ! Right, user AtonX <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AtonX> added them some days ago, I didn’t noticed it.

Looks the right way of doing it then.

Matthieu

> On 24 Feb 2016, at 07:26, joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com <mailto:joost.schouppe at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Mathieu, what you did is what Seppe is suggesting to do in Ghent, if I understand correctly.
> 
> In Brussels you have both areas and lines.  The routing uses the lines. In Ghent, in a lot of places, the lines were removed.
> 
> Op 24-feb.-2016 13:09 schreef "Matthieu Gaillet" <mgwebmail at fastmail.fm <mailto:mgwebmail at fastmail.fm>>:
> I mapped the pedestrian area in Brussels using areas and the autorouter seems quite happy with them : have a look : http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.8472%2C4.3403%3B50.8508%2C4.3524#map=15/50.8500/4.3532 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.8472%2C4.3403%3B50.8508%2C4.3524#map=15/50.8500/4.3532>
> 
> Or did I miss your point ?
> 
> Matthieu (sur iMobile)
> 
> Le 18 févr. 2016 à 13:30, Santens Seppe <Seppe.Santens at stad.gent <mailto:Seppe.Santens at stad.gent>> a écrit :
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding “road” axes in pedestrian areas? My idea is to add to OSM the axes that are in the GRB (Agiv) to aid pedestrian routing. I’ve seen this in some places, in others not (yet?). Is it considered ok to do this? Or would you advice against this because these “virtual axes” cannot be verified in the field?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Seppe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160224/db41d096/attachment.htm>