[Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging
Daniel Begin
jfd553 at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 26 02:09:15 GMT 2012
Interesting,
I guess I'll keep the access=no tag until it is confirmed that the road is
definitely closed. Then, I'll probably tag it as abandoned=yes (instead of
disused) as I suspect it won't be maintained as it is considered dangerous.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned
Someone has an idea on the best list to contact about this rendering
problem?
Thanks
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kliems at gmail.com]
Sent: February-25-12 20:46
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr; talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging
Hi Daniel,
2012/2/25 Daniel Begin <jfd553 at hotmail.com>:
> Le problème est qu'il n'y a pas de construction sur la route. J'utilise ce
> tag seulement lorsqu'il s'agit d'un vrai chantier...
For this reason, I still think that access=no is the cleanest
solution, no matter what mapnik renders. The only alternative I can
see is using the disused tag
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused ). The wiki does not
mention highways, but if you look at the description I think it
matches quite nicely with the problem at hand. And tagwatch says that
there are some instances where people have used disused=* in
combination with highway=*. But this most certainly won't solve your
rendering issue and should probably be discussed on the tagging list.
Harald.
--
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x199DC50F
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list