[Talk-ca] what looks to be imports in North Vancouver - valid?

[john whelan]

That would be my interpretation as well so there is hope for James's bus
stops in Ottawa.

Cheerio John

On 17 March 2016 at 12:33, Stewart C. Russell <scruss at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Michael
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see a bunch of activities by user Marcott such as this (see comment in
> > this and other changesets).
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37885113
>
> Thanks for picking up on this.
>
> > I also notice this activity breaks connections to existing trails etc.
> > Also, trails are being imported raw, e.g. with 1m spacing between nodes,
> > e.g. way too tight.
>
> Ugh. If these are imports, they needed to use their own import account.
> And, of course, not break stuff.
>
> > But the main question is whether the referred to North Vancouver open
> > data are known to be OK to use for OSM?
>
> on the face of it, it *looks* like a straight lift of OGL-BC 2.0, so is
> likely to be okay:
> http://clipol.org/licences/101?tab=licence_compatibility
>
> (this seems to be a different licence from the DNV GEOWeb one, btw,
> which was incompatible.)
>
> cheers,
>  Stewart
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160317/7762e890/attachment.html>