[Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] dangerous cycling lanes (was Re: A new highwaytagging scheme - thinking about)
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 12:55:27 BST 2007
On 8/29/07, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> (moved to talk-gb)
> Andy Allan wrote:
> > I haven't tackled the concept of not-signed-but-nice-anyway routes -
> > so far I've been concentrating on routes signed by external agencies
> How do you (or anyone else) think I should tag the National Byway?
> I'd really like to start surveying it, because their online mapping is
> even more woeful than Sustrans' - in that, er, it doesn't exist.
> If it could be drawn in brown on the OSM Cycle Map that would be even
> better. :)
I'll do that as soon as there's data to be rendered, just let me know
when and what tags, and I'll choose the shade of brown!
As for tagging, I'm not sure. I've got a similar problem with the
Wandle Trail*, which is a green-signed leisure route, different from
the national and london cycle networks and I think done by the local
http://flickr.com/photos/purplespace/44422410/ - ignore the blue
London cycle network number. So the state of play is:
ncn - Sustrans National Cycle network (in red)
rcn - Sustrans Regional Cycle network (in blue)
lcn - local cycle networks (inc. London cycle network) - also in blue
but we need to mark up this National Byway, and any other organised
cycle networks or routes there are that don't fit into the three tags
already that I don't yet know about! acn for Arbitrary Cycle Network?
* Actually, I gave up worrying about that one, since the Wandle Trail
overlaps with a London Cycle network route which in turn forms part of
one of Sustrans' NCN routes so it's not that important!
More information about the Talk-GB