[Talk-GB] HS2 phase 2a preferred route
pmberry2007 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 10:36:37 UTC 2016
I'm not sufficiently up on (read: have not had time to study) what is
firmly planned and what is still under consideration, to be honest, but I
believe you're referring to:
If you know previous route mapping has changed in areas, and remains as
certain as can be for something not on the ground, then map away.
On 7 December 2016 at 10:27, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 08:25, Paul Berry wrote:
>> I We don't know if it's going to take a city centre route or spur from
>> the Don Valley route yet so unless things change the current relation still
>> stands: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4124756
> I thought that, at least here:
> a decision had been made to move east, so that relation is one that does
> need changing, because what's in OSM is no longer the planned route?
> Whether the best thing (until final approval post acts of parliament) is to
> have nothing in OSM and have the data externally somewhere or to have it as
> e.g. "state=proposed" in OSM I could be persuaded either way, but we
> shouldn't have something in OSM that we know to be wrong, as we have at the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB