[Talk-GB] Shared Public Rights of Way

SK53 sk53.osm at gmail.com
Tue Jul 4 13:25:20 UTC 2017


I'd have thought this is because definitive maps were compiled at parish
level on paper and the identifiers created are based on those paper
documents not an IT system. Given that the definitive maps are just that,
any sensible digital record should take cognisance of the fact that the
same path may be on a parish boundary and therefore a path may have more
than one identifier.

As Andy (SomeoneElse) has said there are PRoW which are on the boundary of
two counties (The Drift or Sewstern Lane Lincs/Leics is one) so the
situation also arises across HAs where there would be no expectation of a
common reference system.

Jerry

On 4 July 2017 at 13:51, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:

> Then even more reason to check.
> You'd have thought the organisation responsible would want unique keys to
> avoid confusion.
>
> DaveF
>
> On 04/07/2017 13:44, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>> Parish councils don't have responsibility for the upkeep of rights of
>> way, that is the responsibility of the local highway authority (County
>> Council or Unitary Authority).
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20170704/eac3f980/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list