[Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Thu Dec 10 19:56:34 UTC 2020
Save for some tactile paving what's the difference between North & South?
On 10/12/2020 14:08, Tony Shield wrote:
> /Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
> Unfortunately yes - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295
> Quite clear signage - Mapillary -
> When I walk there I take my chances on the illegal walking along a
> cycleway rather than the 50 mph dual carriageway where it is legal to
> Tony Shield - TonyS999
> On 10/12/2020 12:47, Martin Wynne wrote:
>>> My reasons for changing it, is that it is shared use path with a
>>> greater number of people of foot than bicycle (about 5:2)
>> Many public bridleways have many more walkers and cyclists using it
>> than actual horse-riders. But are still mapped as bridleways.
>> Map it as a cycleway, unless it is a public bridleway, in which case
>> map it as bridleway. You are mapping the status, not the actual usage.
>> My feeling is that a highway should be mapped at the highest level of
>> permitted usage. The assumption is that pedestrians can go almost
>> anywhere anyway. Motorways excepted.
>> Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB