[Talk-GB] Mapping graveyards / church grounds
Colin Spiller
colin at thespillers.org.uk
Mon Feb 15 15:39:24 UTC 2021
One final entry from me. St Helens Council have an excellent resource
for searching their cemetery records at
https://www.sthelens.gov.uk/births-deaths-and-marriages/deaths-funerals-and-cremation/deceased-search
There are maps of the two graveyards covered but it's only a plan of the
sections - no specific grave locations.
Colin
On 15/02/2021 14:57, Adam Hoyle (OSMUK) via Talk-GB wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the great responses, I will pass them all on.
>
> The kirkburton site looks great, shame they haven’t used Open Street
> Map for their map, but there is a definite charm in the hand drawn maps.
>
> The examples of big cemeteries are great (Washington DC, Paris and
> Highgate) as is the landuse=religious wiki page, which seems very
> thorough and should act as a good guide.
>
> Findagrave.com also looks interesting - it seems to be started by an
> individual but now owned/operated by Ancestry.com with a lot of
> community feedback, so this could be a good additional place to put
> data (obviously I would encourage adding to openstreetmap first ;)).
> It /seems/ to me, that if findagrave.com is a well known resource for
> grave yards that it would be useful to add the find a grave id to
> openstreetmap, but TagInfo seems to indicate that findagrave has only
> been referenced once -
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=findagrave#values - I
> presume an appropriate tag would be ref:findagrave, but is there a
> better tag, or a reason not to add the reference at all (or a better
> reference source)?
>
> In terms of privacy or access etc, the family friend has been
> specifically commissioned by the parish and also has access to all of
> their records (or will have once pandemic eases and access is possible).
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
> On 14 Feb 2021, 21:18 +0000, Steven Hirschorn
> <steven.hirschorn at gmail.com>, wrote:
>> I also wondered about progressively mapping cemeteries previously,
>> there are websites that allow people who live too far from a cemetery
>> to request that someone locally take a photo of an ancestor's grave.
>> My local cemeteries are labelled by area, but each area can contain
>> dozens of graves. Mapping row numbers would massively simplify
>> finding particular plots.
>>
>> eg
>> https://www.findagrave.com/photo-request/search/cemetery/880537?sortBy=newest&searchRadius=5
>>
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, 19:48 Mark Goodge, <mark at good-stuff.co.uk
>> <mailto:mark at good-stuff.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14/02/2021 16:29, David Woolley wrote:
>>
>> > I have come across graveyards that have no photography rules
>> (the one in
>> > question had a relatively famous grave), and I think others
>> sell grave
>> > catalogue information, so might not appreciate OSM mappers
>> (they are
>> > private property).
>>
>> Most graveyards and cemeteries belong either to the church they are
>> associated with or the local authority (usually the parish council if
>> there is one, otherwise the district or unitary authority). While
>> technically private in the sense of not being dedicated as a public
>> right of way, they are almost always open to access by the public
>> - not
>> least because the owners of individual burial plots have a right of
>> access, and it would be impractical to restrict access to such people
>> alone. So, provided you do it reasonably discreetly, and don't
>> disturb
>> people who are there to visit graves, I can't see any real
>> objection to
>> people accessing the site to help map it.
>>
>> (In fact, the legislation governing municipal cemeteries includes a
>> clause prohibiting entry to a cemetery when it is closed to the
>> public;
>> the existence of that clause implies that, when not closed, it is
>> open
>> to the public!)
>>
>> A "no photography" rule is, usually, also about protecting the
>> privacy
>> of people visiting the graves of their friends and relatives. It's a
>> location were people may well be in an emotional state
>> (particularly if
>> the grave is a recent one and they were close to its occupant),
>> and the
>> last thing they want is to end up in someone else's photo gallery.
>>
>> As for selling catalogue information, that's usually made
>> available for
>> the benefit of visitors to the graveyard and the cost is merely a
>> way to
>> defray the expenses incurred in maintaining the catalogue (and,
>> if it's
>> supplied on paper, the printing and materials costs). It's rarely a
>> profit-making exercise. So they may well welcome the work of
>> volunteer
>> mappers who would be producing data that can be used in a catalogue.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Colin Spiller
colin at thespillers.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210215/1a8c9055/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list