[Talk-GB] Historic England - tagging guidelines - can we agree on the English usage

Tom Crocker tomcrockermail at gmail.com
Fri Jul 23 23:01:49 UTC 2021


On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, 19:17 Jez Nicholson, <jez.nicholson at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm happy to agree with the heritage:ref seeing as this is a clear,
> defacto reference.
>
> Are there any hidden benefits to having separate he/cadw/etc. references
> that we would miss out on? Are there any arguments against heritage:ref?
>

I've not tagged heritage status so don't really know anything about this.
My only thought would be about multi/pan-national heritage organisations
like UNESCO. But perhaps since there will only ever be a few such
organisations it makes sense for them to have their own ref tag?

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210724/d7006bcc/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list