[Talk-in] National Highway relations are unacceptably huuuuge!

Arun Ganesh arun.planemad at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 15:25:57 UTC 2016

This is looking good to me. It would be great to have a diary post on
tools/workflow to do this. Have always found handling and modifying these
relations painful.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) <mapper at minoa.li>

> Hi,
> I have set up NH765 as a prototype for the reformed relations - NH765 is a
> small route where it should be easy to fine tune the idea before full-scale
> conversion.
> The base route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3871741) would
> only contain sub-relations with for each State that it passes through with
> appropriate role names (as the E-route system already does).
> The sub-relations, for Telangana (
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5826946) and Andhra Pradesh (
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5826980) in our case, would
> contain appropriately ordered ways, with the main route on top and links
> (slip roads) at the bottom.
> I envisage that one relation for each state should be sufficient for the
> time being.
> — Amaroussi.
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Arun Ganesh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20160721/d22b111b/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-in mailing list