[Talk-in] Tagging guidelines for buildings
garade at protonmail.com
Thu Jan 21 06:39:42 UTC 2021
> Reason why I do this is shops move from building to building so a node is easier as that leaves the building behind.
Understood. That makes sense.
I think, I too will follow what you are doing, with some modification like:
For immovable properties such as a residential society, park, temple etc., directly tag the building area with the building details.
For movable property, such as shop inside a building or mall etc., add a separate node ( inside the building) and tag it with the shop details.
> People do either.
I was wondering if we could agree upon some guideline for this and update the wiki with it.
So that it will help others also, who may have this question. And also help in consistent tagging style across India.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:51 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/1/21 4:22 pm, संकेत गराडे via Talk-in wrote:
>> Thanks for the response.
>>> More detailed is better.. as it has more information.
>>> So a separate node of area for the toilets is better than a tag on the
>>> building as it indicates where in the building the toilets are.
>> This, I understand, is fine for structures where there are sub-parts ,eg. such as a toilet inside a building.
>> But say, there is just one standalone grocery shop, then
>> 1. do I directly tag the building area with the shop name and its address etc.
>> 2. Let the building area ( ie. The square shape) be as it is, without any tags. And add another node, say in front of the grocery store, and give the name, address etc. tags to that node.
>> Which of the above 2 is a better or standard practice?
> People do either.
> I prefer to map the building foot print and then tag that as building=retail (or what ever type of building it is)
> Then put a node inside the building and tag that shop=grocery, name=*, and anything else that you have. Reason why I do this is shops move from building to building so a node is easier as that leaves the building behind.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-in