[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries

maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 10:14:38 BST 2009


murlwe,

I just saw the render of boundary=national_park.
There seems to be a previous boundary of Mt. Apo.  I'm sorry for the
duplicate, should I remove my import?

I'm not sure which data is a better.

On 7/2/09, Marloue Pidor <murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
> Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.
>
> murlwe
> <-----Original Message----->
>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM
>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
> nationalparksboundaries
>>
>>It's done!
>>
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598
>>
>>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643
>>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637
>>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a
>>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning
>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected
> area
>>> boundaries.  Anyone?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Fineprint:
>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity
>>Conservation
>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue
>>Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>>>> Maning,
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the
>>Mt. Apo
>>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3
>>section that
>>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the
> shape
>>>>> file, it is already merged.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> murlwe
>>>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national
>>>>>> parksboundaries
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I
>>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>>>>Download link:
>>>>>>
> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we
>>include those
>>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use
>>OSM for
>>>>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are
>>no road
>>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first
>>place. It
>>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist)
>>to be able
>>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features
>>I dream of
>>>>>>> adding:
>>>>>>> 1. rivers
>>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>> > noel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>>>>>
>>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large
>>squares just to
>>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first,
>>before import.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>>>>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look
>>at before adding
>>>>>>them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
>>>>>>>>>
>>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of
>>publication
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that
>>Microsoft Encarta
>>>>>>used in its
>>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into
>>Google Maps/Map
>>>>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363
> ,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layer
> s=B000FTF
>>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale
>>>>>><emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed
>>protected areas as initial
>>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial
>>and inland
>>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected
>>areas as additional
>>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial
>>and inland
>>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed
>>protected areas
>>>>>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial
>>components
>>>>>>vis-a-vis
>>>>>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water
>>priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas
>>vis-a-vis integrated
>>>>>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the
>>Philippine
>>>>>>Biodiversity
>>>>>>>>>>> Conservation
>>>>>>>>>>> Prior
>>
>>=== message truncated ===
>
>
> <span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"
> style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get
> the Free email that has everyone talking at <a
> href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>
> <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar
> – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>


-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------




More information about the talk-ph mailing list