[talk-ph] Node position for towns
Eugene Alvin Villar
seav80 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 15:59:47 BST 2010
BTW, what do we do to he gns_*=* tags when moving them?
Also I think that the source=gns tag MUST be deleted (or modified) when you
move them since the position of the node is no longer sourced from GNS when
you move it.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>wrote:
> Last year, Axel proposed an approach to make the place nodes more accurate:
> this is because GNS specifies towns and cities (Feature Designation Code
> (DGS) == ADM2 (second-order administrative division)) with a low 1 to 2
> digits after the comma precision only. which makes sense, as these
> entities can be quite big.
> there are also much exacter (3 to 5 digit precision) coordinates of all
> these towns and cities in GNS, the ones with DGS == PPL, populated
> place. for example, for maasin in southern leyte:
> ADM2: 10.2, 124.85
> PPL: 10.133611, 124.844722
> unfortunately, there is no easy way to relate the place with the exact
> coordinates to the administrative division. which i guess is why the
> import used the low precision coordinates and we got towns in the
> Philippine Sea and coastal towns on mountain ranges now.
> there might be some way, though. i've been fiddling around with this for
> some hours now and got some results that don't look too bad. my basic
> idea: get the name and some other characteristics (province, jog) of
> ADM2 and find the PPL entry with the same name and characteristics.
> there are some problems with this approach: ADM2 and PPL must have the
> same name (doesn't work for "Ormoc City"/"Ormoc"), sometimes there are
> more than 1 PPL with the same name and characteristics as ADM2 ("San
> Miguel"), sometimes the PPL coordinates are not of better precision, ...
> nonetheless, with some tweaking, i got precise coordinates for 1271
> towns and cities, or 78% of the "136 cities, 1,495 municipalities" 
> of the philippines.
> for a visual comparision of the old import and my results, i uploaded 2
> josm screenshots of leyte with landsat background . first with the
> old towns and cities, then with the better precision. note how the
> coastal towns align nicely with the coastline in the second image.
> comments? any interest in redoing the import like this?
> p.s. does anyone know of a way to automatically find all towns and
> cities that have been edited / relocated after the initial import? these
> towns wouldn't have to be reimported.
>  http://picasaweb.google.com/axkosm/gns
> He is referring to a wikipedia's Cities and municipalities entries
> which has a lon/lat coordinates. I've checked on some of them and
> indeed it seems to be more accurate:
> However, many of these coordinates were extracted from Google Maps
> (there goes the debate again). In addition, even if we are allowed to
> use this data, it maybe even more harmful to re-import 136 cities and
> 1,495 municipalities again because many have been manually moved
> Re-visiting his message and looking at his screenshots:
> Another way for those interested to do wholesale adjustment of place
> nodes is to use Landsat image (in JOSM or Merkaartor). Concentration
> of settlements which is an indicator of the town's poblacion are seen
> as gray-purpleish color. You can adjust the nodes within that area.
> For long distance travellers, you can also note the KM markers along
> highways. KM 0 is usually the town center.
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Marloue Pidor <murlwe at mail2engineer.com>
> > On that note, Maguindanao's Municipal Hall is located somewhere in the
> > plains with only two large structures in sight the rest are
> > That's the center of the municipality and almost nothing around the area.
> > been there years before and still no significant structures around the
> > center except two big houses.
> > murlwe
> > <-----Original Message----->
> >>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
> >>Sent: 4/7/2010 6:52:03 AM
> >>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> >>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Node position for towns
> >>And of course there will be exceptions. Puerto Princesa City Hall is
> >>several kilometers away from the traditional city center/poblacion.
> >>Some towns are also relocating town halls away from the poblacion in
> >>order to add more buildings and decongest the center.
> >>On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> I suggest to place the node in the town/city proper, which is not the
> >>> geographical center and not always where the city or town hall is. The
> >>> city/town proper is basically where the town plaza or poblacion area
> >>> Usually, it's where the church or public market is.
> >>> For example, the Las Pinas city hall is here:
> >>> But I placed the Las Pinas place=city node in the poblacion area, where
> >>> the
> >>> plaza and the main church (home of the famous Bamboo Organ) is:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Jim Morgan <jim at datalude.com> wrote:
> >>>> Ed Garcia wrote, On Tuesday, 06 April, 2010 10:05 PM:
> >>>> > Glad you agree guys! Surprised to see so many +1s in barely an hour
> >>>> > from posting. Okay then, I'll start with San Antonio in Zambales.
> >> That
> >>>> > town node is currently so far away from town proper ... it is
> >>>> > located on the mountains.
> >>>> Seems like a lot of these town / village / city markers are way off
> >>>> mark to begin with. I guess they were imported en masse from an
> >>>> imprecise
> >>>> source. They usually seem to be 1 or 2 km off the mark. Usually when I
> >>>> find
> >>>> them, I'll drag them closer to a known settlement -- sort of plonk it
> >>in the
> >>>> middle of the most obvious mass of houses on a satellite view, or near
> >>>> the
> >>>> most obvious confluence of roads. Then when someone with more local
> >>>> knowledge finds it, they drag it closer to the City Hall ... and when
> >>>> the
> >>>> City Hall is actually on the map, then it's truly accurate.
> >>>> This process of gradually getting more and more precise seems to be
> >>>> OSM is all about really.
> >>>> Jim
> >>>> --
> >>>> datalude: information security
> >>>> e: jim at datalude.com
> >>>> Philippines: +63 2 403 1311 / mob: +63 920 912 5830
> >>>> Hong Kong: +852 6840 6693
> >>>> w: http://www.datalude.com/
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> talk-ph mailing list
> >>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> >>> --
> >>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> talk-ph mailing list
> >>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> >>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> >>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> >>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> >>talk-ph mailing list
> >>talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > Get the Free email that has everyone talking at
> > Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk-ph