[talk-ph] Allowed uses of map
Eugene Alvin Villar
seav80 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 13 15:34:02 GMT 2011
Wayne is actually the one who created the image and he works for
GMANews.TV. The attribution is there but the license details is not.
Personally, I'm quite OK with the neglect of mention of any licensing
or copyright. Like you said, it's pretty doubtful that anyone would
want to reuse this map outside the context of the news article. The
attribution is what matters most for this kind of use. :-)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, <sorabsuperstar at web.de> wrote:
>>> Is this an allowed use of OpenStreetMap? Is the "Base map from OpenStreetMap" sufficient?
>> BTW, nice use of OSM. ;-)
> But yet it is non-licence-complaint use of OSM.
> A correct notification for this map could for example look like"
> © OpenStreetMap contributors and GMANews.TV, CC-BY-SA
> This said, it is pretty obvious to me that GMA did not act in bad faith. They tried to give attribution to OSM, they just don't know how to do it the right way :P
> Theoretically problematic is that the license tag is missing too. So technically speaking they did not relicense their derivative work share alike. But practically I do not think that anyone wants to reuse that image anyway.
> Btw: License or not, it is certainly not a copyright violation if Wayne posts the link to that website in an email. :)
More information about the talk-ph