[talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps

[David Groom]

I have no idea why i wrote what I did in that last post on this topic !

What I meant to write was:

I think it would be appropriate to re-tag these with the appropriate 
highway type , ensuring that "bridge=yes" and "layer=1" are also on the 
way

David

------ Original Message ------
From: "David Groom" <reviews at pacific-rim.net>
To: "talk-ph" <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 27/04/2017 16:46:15
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps

>I think it would be OK to re-tag these as the appropriate highway type 
>with "_link".
>
>David
>
>------ Original Message ------
>From: "Jherome Miguel" <jheromemiguel at gmail.com>
>To: "talk-ph" <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
>Sent: 21/04/2017 13:11:48
>Subject: [talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps
>
>>There are a lot of bridges in Samar that are still mapped as link 
>>roads or ramps and this brought misleading directions when I got 
>>directions between Manila and Tacloban, and it is also the problem 
>>when routing on Cagayan Valley Road in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija, for 
>>example, when getting directions from Manila to Tuguegarao or any 
>>point in Nueva Ecija, Aurora, Nueva Vizcaya, Quirino, Isabela, or 
>>Cagayan. Having bridges mapped as link roads makes routers say that 
>>you take the ramp, or other instructions. I do not know who made such 
>>mapping, but it is in the past years and no one have floated that 
>>mapping by any user[s], that should have been fixed earlier before it 
>>can affect directions.
>>
>>--TagaSanPedroAko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20170502/b878091a/attachment-0001.html>