[Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Mon May 13 15:38:36 UTC 2019

I agree that platforms should be mapped as ways only if they physically
exist. What I'm saying is that I don't object if someone does map such an
object, but the information from the transit agency should always be
contained in a node, not a way, as Jo mentioned.

I usually place the node inside the closed way if it exists, but another
possibility (and necessary if it's an unclosed way) is to make the node a
part of the way.

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:36 PM Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> On 13/05/2019 16:14, Johnparis wrote:
> > I don't have any particular problem with mapping an area (closed way) or
> a
> > way (line segment) as a platform,
> Please, please only map a platform /if/ it's a physical structure.
> Imaginary meta-objects  don't work in OSM
> DaveF
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20190513/580748db/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-transit mailing list