[Talk-us-massachusetts] Missing and unnamed streets

[Jason Remillard]

Hi Greg,


> One thing that I've said repeatedly is that we should be expecting to
> import the non-problematic set of addresses, and to expect that some
> points are going to fail autaomated matching, and be left for either
> later or some hand process.  Nobody has told me this is wrong, but I
> keep hearing a "fix so we can import 100%" notion.
>

No, I have 100% given up on that. My vote is that Importing 98% of the data
that matches perfectly is ok.

Also, I will exclude Stow from the map roulette tasks.

Jason




>
> Do you (and others) think we're headed to only importing points that
> pass some automated matching process?
>
> > I will sign up for setting up the MapRoulette using the fuzzy search. I
> > have time this weekend.
>
> Can you explain how the instructions work, and how maproulette avoids
> people just doing a mechanical turk import?
>
> > Yury, no rush, but could you create a second data set (keep the fuzzy
> > search data set available), and do a straight case-insensitive match. I
> > would like to pick through Groton and Acton again and see what percentage
> > are issues in OSM again...
>
> Seconded.  I would likke to see what the results are in Stow.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20180816/d645c99b/attachment.html>