[Talk-us] What should a US map of OSM data look like

[Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)]

Shields def, also using the interstate, (urbal/rural) arterial, collectorand local nomenclature instead of trunk, primary, secondary.   Fix the labling issues related to mulitiple cities near each other (ie Cambridge and all of the cities bordering Boston).  
Sent with Verizon Mobile Email


---Original Message---
From: "Nathan Edgars II" <neroute2 at gmail.com>
Sent: 9/12/2011 6:43 pm
To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] What should a US map of OSM data look like

On 9/12/2011 5:57 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> A few of us were just asking on irc what a US-style tile theme would
> look like?

Many printed US maps emphasize divided highways (often including 
undivided multilane highways). Perhaps a thicker line style at low zooms 
where lanes>=4 or oneway=yes -lanes=1.

A separate color for toll=yes (like MapQuest does, but also for toll 
non-motorways).

Fix bloody Georgia and the way the trunks (and other highways) blend 
into the trees.

Render shields at lower resolutions, since the US is not as dense as the UK.

De-emphasize railways at lower zooms.

Label motorways with both name and number where both are tagged (this 
would be useful even in Europe).

 > Ian Dees liked the idea of fewer different colors for roads, blue /
 > motorway, green / trunk, red / primary ...

I'm not sure what the point of this would be - there's definitely enough 
variation in importance for all these classifications to be useful.

 > For extra credit, can it also look good in Canada and Mexico?

Canada and the US have rather similar road systems, so what works in one 
should be good for the other. I believe Mexico has a fair number of 
rural non-motorway toll roads.

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us