[Talk-us] User adding many Safeway grocery stores, with ref number in name
richard at weait.com
Sun Jan 8 16:51:48 GMT 2012
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 7:49 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
>> Seems all recent edits have been just adding Safeway stores:
>> The edits seem good (adding building outlines), though I'm not sure
>> about putting the store number in the name, I've always put that in the
>> ref tag. What do you think, should we ask the user to change this?
> I could see both sides of this - receipts are likely printed "Welcome to
> Safeway #xxx", and so the map would appear correct and contain additional
> detail. The disadvantage is that an exact match search for "Safeway" would
> fail, depending on the search algorithm in use. It's not clear to me how
> the ref field would be used in conjunction with buildings.
I see the appeal of the store number in the name if you are a Safeway
insider. As an average mapper (or map consumer) that data seems
unmaintainable. I'd have to zip inside each store and find the store
number on a receipt or a plaque on the wall somewhere. I expect that
fast food chains and other chains have store numbers as well, or
ownership information that is more-correct from a legal point of view.
I like the idea of having that data in OSM but I don't think that it
belongs in the name tag. ref, perhaps or store:ref or something like
that seems a much better place for it. Safeway insiders can still
choose to render or search on the combined terms.
Josh, could you suggest that the contributor use additional tags please?
More information about the Talk-us