[Talk-us] Special issues in LA remap

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 6/5/2012 3:42 PM, Mike N wrote:
> On 6/5/2012 2:56 PM, stevea wrote:
>> But "socially," or more properly stated, in the context of "reaching OSM
>> consensus," what does our community think of (rather wholesale) reverts
>> of a contributor who has not agreed to the CT? Are we OK with that?
>
> This nearly describes what the redaction bot will do, once it is
> complete.

With one big difference: the bot will not undelete objects that an 
ungood mapper deleted. (So any joining of ways by such a mapper will be 
handled improperly.)