[Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations
rwelty at averillpark.net
Fri Oct 19 02:54:14 BST 2012
it's not a traditional method of doing that, but i do think it could work.
it does also seem to address Paul Johnson's concern about distinguishing
On 10/18/12 9:36 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
> Hi Richard, thanks!
> The "CR" vs. County name thing is new to me. Another mapper suggested that I replace them with something like this so it's not necessary to know all the county names in order to correctly interpret something as a county route:
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>> the scrubbing looks mostly ok, BUT...
>> i am one of the folks who started out using US:<state>:CR for county route networks, which i now believe was
>> a mistake. we really should be using county names, not CR in the network tag, e.g.
>> otherwise we can't really tell which county the route is in, and can't distinguish CR 1 in Columbia County from CR 1 in
>> Rensselaer County.
>> On 10/18/12 7:26 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> We're getting ready to do a major data update to the Stamen Terrain layer and I've been working on scrubbing the route relations data from OSM. I've linked to a before and after CSV, processed via Google Refine to normalize networks, refs and modifiers.
>>> I'm curious to get some feedback on it:
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> michal migurski- mike at stamen.com
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-us