[Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

Clay Smalley claysmalley at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 21:23:21 GMT 2013


You. You have the ground truth. He has no right deleting useful data from
OSM.

I think it's a general rule that when NE2 fights with other OSM
contributors, he loses.
On Feb 8, 2013 2:59 PM, "Paul Johnson" <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> NE2 is going on the "World according to NE2" bender again, need a ruling
> on this relation before I revert:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811
>
> Turn in question is southbound World Drive at Buena Vista Drive in
> Orlando, http://binged.it/128OlwZ.  Despite left turn only markings on
> the southbound approach and a flush median gore preventing a straight-on
> movement, NE2 is of the opinion, and removed the relation, on the excuse
> that "Anyway, I've deleted the turn restriction, since I cannot recall
> having seen any signs prohibiting the movement, and you have not seen any
> such signs because you have not been there." Never mind that the left
> turn only sign is clearly marked on the pavement. He questioned the legal
> standing of the marking since it omits "ONLY," despite the fact that
> section 4.2.1 of the Florida Traffic Engineering Manual requires ONLY to be
> omitted in situations such as the ramp in question (a straight/left arrow
> would be required for a through-or-left-turn lane).
>
> Who's right?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130208/4235c793/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list