[Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Fri Feb 8 23:29:12 GMT 2013

Alright, assuming I don't get feedback to the contrary, I intend to revert
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14958467 later this weekend,
probably Sunday.

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Clay Smalley <claysmalley at gmail.com> wrote:

> You. You have the ground truth. He has no right deleting useful data from
> OSM.
> I think it's a general rule that when NE2 fights with other OSM
> contributors, he loses.
> On Feb 8, 2013 2:59 PM, "Paul Johnson" <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>> NE2 is going on the "World according to NE2" bender again, need a ruling
>> on this relation before I revert:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811
>> Turn in question is southbound World Drive at Buena Vista Drive in
>> Orlando, http://binged.it/128OlwZ.  Despite left turn only markings on
>> the southbound approach and a flush median gore preventing a straight-on
>> movement, NE2 is of the opinion, and removed the relation, on the excuse
>> that "Anyway, I've deleted the turn restriction, since I cannot recall
>> having seen any signs prohibiting the movement, and you have not seen any
>> such signs because you have not been there." Never mind that the left
>> turn only sign is clearly marked on the pavement. He questioned the legal
>> standing of the marking since it omits "ONLY," despite the fact that
>> section 4.2.1 of the Florida Traffic Engineering Manual requires ONLY to be
>> omitted in situations such as the ramp in question (a straight/left arrow
>> would be required for a through-or-left-turn lane).
>> Who's right?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130208/0a960d05/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list