[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

[Phil! Gold]

* James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
> So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
> tagging these "Future" Interstates?

Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:

    network=US:I:Future
    ref=<number>
    modifier=Future

and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
recommend tagging as above.

Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and
840.  Are there any others?