[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
phil_g at pobox.com
Wed Jul 10 12:40:58 UTC 2013
* James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
> So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
> tagging these "Future" Interstates?
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
recommend tagging as above.
Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and
840. Are there any others?
More information about the Talk-us