[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

[James Mast]

There is one other.  I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday (07-09-13).  That is I-295 in Fayetteville.
 
http://gribblenation.net/ncfutints/fut295.html
 
And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the ":Future" part dropped out and just put in the "modifier" area.
 
-James
 
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:40:58 -0400
> From: phil_g at pobox.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
> 
> * James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
> > So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
> > tagging these "Future" Interstates?
> 
> Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
> 
>     network=US:I:Future
>     ref=<number>
>     modifier=Future
> 
> and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
> recommend tagging as above.
> 
> Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and
> 840.  Are there any others?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130710/e7d4a504/attachment.html>