[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 10 12:59:30 UTC 2013
There is one other. I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday (07-09-13). That is I-295 in Fayetteville.
And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the ":Future" part dropped out and just put in the "modifier" area.
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:40:58 -0400
> From: phil_g at pobox.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
> * James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
> > So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
> > tagging these "Future" Interstates?
> Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
> and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
> recommend tagging as above.
> Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and
> 840. Are there any others?
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us