[Talk-us] USBRS WikiProject seeks volunteer mappers

[Paul Johnson]

Aah, sounds like the cycle_network proponents may have gotten overzealous,
then; good catch.  Could someone check history and contact mappers?


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Andy Allan <andy at gravitystorm.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 20/07/14 18:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Minh Nguyen
> > <minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us <mailto:minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us>>
> wrote:
> >
> >     On 2014-07-19 23:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >         Likewise, I'm in favor of heirarchies similar to road relations
> for
> >         cyclists (ie, Portland area network=lcn becomes
> >         US:OR:Multnomah:Portland
> >         or US:OR:Metro or US:OR:Multnomah; Tulsa's LCNs would become
> >         US:OK:Tulsa:Riverparks or US:OK:INCOG or US:OK:Tulsa or
> >         US:OK:Tulsa:Tusla or US:OK:Tulsa:Broken Arrow...etc
> >
> >
> >     http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Key:cycle_network
> >     <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycle_network>
> >     http://taginfo.openstreetmap.__org/keys/cycle_network#values
> >     <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycle_network#values>
> >
> >
> > Nice!  OK, so apparently I'm not the first person to think this.  Also
> > explains why a vast majority of cycleways, particularly in the areas
> > that taginfo suggests have migrated, aren't rendering on the cyclemap
> > layer.  Wonder if we can get Andy Allen to update the style to make use
> > of this scheme.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I think there's some confusion somewhere. As far as I can see the
> cycle_network and network tags are separate, so you can add these
> additional tags without removing network=lcn etc.
>
> So I don't know what you're asking me to update.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140721/27c4a19b/attachment.html>