[Talk-us] National Forest "nature_reserve"?
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Tue Jun 2 23:04:42 UTC 2015
Russell Deffner <russell.deffner at hotosm.org> writes:
> Sorry I don’t follow this topic more closely but I would think with
> the mixed-used of national forests, it is best to use
> boundary=protected_area but I know it has been discussed a bunch,
> so someone might have an even better answer.
I agree that leisure=nature_reserve is not right. I add that to land
with primary tag landuse=conservation when human access is permitted
subject to non-interference with the creatures, more or less.
Really a US national forest is landuse=forest, except that the
landuse=forest tag has the (not really right) connotation of trees as
As for "boundary=protected_area", while there are rules, this seems off
as National Forests aren't really conservation land. Plus, I've always
objected to putting semantics like that on the boundary when really it's
a property of the polygon. But I know it's established practice....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Talk-us