[Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net
Mon Jun 15 20:31:14 UTC 2015

SteveA wrote:
> Richard (Fairhurst), if cycle.travel/map's router logic is not 
> paying attention to surface= tags, perhaps it should, as 
> doing so truly can improve selected routes

It very much does - it'll look at surface=, and failing that tracktype= or
smoothness=, as one of the principal criteria for "how cyclable is this?".
I've suffered on too many bumpy dirt paths in my time to let that one past!


View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/cycle-travel-US-bike-routing-and-unreviewed-rural-TIGER-tp5848084p5848239.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Talk-us mailing list