[Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

[Richard Fairhurst]

SteveA wrote:
> Richard (Fairhurst), if cycle.travel/map's router logic is not 
> paying attention to surface= tags, perhaps it should, as 
> doing so truly can improve selected routes

It very much does - it'll look at surface=, and failing that tracktype= or
smoothness=, as one of the principal criteria for "how cyclable is this?".
I've suffered on too many bumpy dirt paths in my time to let that one past!

cheers
Richard





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/cycle-travel-US-bike-routing-and-unreviewed-rural-TIGER-tp5848084p5848239.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.