[Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER
nelson at crynwr.com
Tue Jun 16 03:06:43 UTC 2015
Minh Nguyen writes:
> You aren't alone. I stopped bothering with tiger:reviewed tags back in
> the Potlatch 1 days. It just isn't a well-designed tag:
> - not very discoverable to mappers who weren't around in 2008
Makes ways a sickly yellow if you edit using JOSM.
> - doesn't say whether the names, classification, or geometry was
> reviewed, or whether the review covered the entire way
I remove it when I've checked (usually via field survey, but sometimes
when someone else that I know has been there) that the name is
correct, and ensured that the geometry is correct. I used to just
remove tiger:reviewed, but now I remove all the tiger: tags.
> But I think it'd be unfortunate to totally discount
> tiger:reviewed=no ways.
I think the usual thing to do is check to see if DaveHansenTiger is
still the owner.
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
More information about the Talk-us