[Talk-us] Another road classification disagreement (this time with HFCS in Kansas)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Richard Welty wrote:
> i could see having an HFCS tag which carries that value for 
> informational purposes, but it shouldn't control our own classification.

In the UK we use the designation= tag to record official classifications
which might not be reflected in the highway type - I'd commend it.

Toby Murray wrote:
> This user has also upgraded a lot of unpaved county roads in 
> eastern Kansas to secondary because of HFCS which also strikes 
> me as wrong. You can clearly see where he has done this at 
> zoom level 9 [6]. 

Ye gods. That's horrid, and breaks every single car and bicycle router in
existence. Are those changesets cleanly revertable, or do we need a manual
fixup?

Richard





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Another-road-classification-disagreement-this-time-with-HFCS-in-Kansas-tp5854071p5854085.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.